I find some elements of the plot of May Sinclair's novella The Flaw in the Crystal contrived and confusing.
The final resolution of Agatha Verrall's dilemma in particular seems unconvincing and unsatisfactory. She finds a solution to her difficulties that leaves some questions unanswered and some issues unaddressed.
Agatha Verrall's dilemma
We left Agatha Verrall in a situation where she is damned if she uses her gift to heal people remotely and damned if she doesn't.
Taking away people's suffering means becoming possessed by her subjects' former mental states: the psychic connection is a two-way street. The links that she creates between herself and her subjects may be also be cross-contaminated such that one subject can get at another.
Cutting ties with people who have been healed means that their mental anguish returns. This entails watching them suffer and coming under both internal and external pressure to resume the healing.
It would be an ideal solution to this predicament if Agatha could only use her Power without anyone involved experiencing any unpleasant side-effects.
This is much easier said than done, but Agatha eventually finds the way. Things get worse before they get better though.
Agatha Verrall cuts the tie with Harding Powell
Agatha Verral decides that saving Rodney Lanyon is more important than anything else. This entails sacrificing Harding Powell's health by cutting the tie that binds him to her.
Harding puts up a big fight, hanging on desperately and tearing down the psychic walls she builds as fast as she can build them, but eventually with help from the Power she loosens his hold, casts him out and escapes from his malign influence.
Harding reverts to his former state. Poor Milly is distraught again and begs for the help that she knows Agatha can give.
Agatha Verrall sees the light
Agatha has always had the conviction that the Power she taps is benevolent. So, if it is so high, holy, sacred and pure, how can something like this awful mess happen? Why has her gift brought so much suffering to people?