This is the final article in the series that was originally inspired by a comment made by Terry Pratchett and contains some recycled and enhanced material from a thread on the old Conservative Conspiracy Forum.
I visited my local library recently for the first time in many months. The rules have been relaxed: there was no doorkeeper making sure that people wore masks and used the hand sanitiser and no requirement to leave contact details.
I noticed some changes: the coffee machine has gone, where there were three machines for scanning borrowed and returned books and paying fees there is now only one, and the trolley where reserved books wait to be picked up was almost empty. These are not good signs. It could be that it will take a few more weeks before demand is back to what it was before the COVID virus appeared, or it could be that things will never be the same.
What will happen to this and other libraries in the future?
Key amenity or waste of public money?
I have seen a lot of information and many discussions about library-associated issues online.
Having to live without many library services because of the COVID restrictions has provided a further reason for both dedicated library suporters and critics of the system to publish and reassess their views on topics such as the value or otherwise of public libraries to the community, the alarming number of closures – and not just barely-used rural branches - for budgetary reasons, how libraries could adapt to changes in society and whether or not they should still be publicly funded.
I have already mentioned some specific criticisms of public libraries. Many of the general objections in the old discussion thread were based on politics and principles.
Some members thought that library services should not be free, that there are better and higher-priority uses for taxpayers' money, and in any case there are better options available for people who want books to read:
“...people don't need libraries, they need communal spaces where they can build relationships with others in the community.”
Why not have both? Anyway, some people enjoy reading much more than they do spending a lot of time with people!
“It's also important to bear in mind that I'm not denigrating reading books at all; I'm merely criticising the ideas that a) having free access to books is a right; and b) it really makes a marked difference in anyone's life. If local governments want to run libraries, fine, but make them pay for themselves, with subscription fees. I don't particularly want to pay money into non-essential propaganda services.”
There is plenty of evidence that libraries do change people's lives!
In my – biased – opinion, the supporters of public libraries make a much better case for their cause than the antis do.