Not only can we see it as a falling out
between a cult member and the person he targeted for cultivation and
recruitment, we can also treat it as an occult war between two black magicians.
Either way, we have two men quarrelling in a very uncivilised and low-class
way.
These scenarios or interpretations of events
are not mutually exclusive; they all have relevance to the case. This final
article in the series will cover these different dimensions of Strindberg’s
story.
The cult member and the target
The secret friend’s persistence is sinister.
Surely a normal, decent person would have realised long ago that Strindberg was
just not buying Madame Blavatsky and her ideology and given up trying to sell
to and recruit him. He sounds just like
one of those Multi-level Marketers who won’t take ‘no’ for an answer!
Strindberg says that this man was very anxious for him to give a good opinion of Blavatsky’s book. His reaction to Strindberg’s criticism is a classic, textbook example of a cult member’s behaviour when the cult leader or the ideology is criticised or someone refuses to join after being targeted.
Strindberg says that this man was very anxious for him to give a good opinion of Blavatsky’s book. His reaction to Strindberg’s criticism is a classic, textbook example of a cult member’s behaviour when the cult leader or the ideology is criticised or someone refuses to join after being targeted.
So why exactly was this man so determined to
recruit Strindberg and why did he react the way he did when he finally failed?
I get the impression that some cult members
are controlled - or even possessed - and under orders; I sense fear in addition
to anger: they behave as if they will be terribly punished if they don’t
complete their assignments successfully. They will pay for it if the targeted prey
escapes.