Wednesday, 17 April 2019

August Strindberg’s mystery man again

This article in the series inspired by Swedish playwright August Strindberg’s autobiographical novel Inferno is an addition to the one about the mystery man who was for a while Strindberg’s close and sole companion.

It contains a few more ideas about this episode in his life. It is useful to put these things into some sort of context, so although not all of the material is directly relevant it is connected to Strindberg in some way. Even Nietzsche gets a mention!

The ‘former American friend’
In this case, it is not obvious who is the main victim and who the victimiser.

Perhaps this man was a mirror or a messenger. Perhaps Strindberg appeared and behaved to others as the mystery man did to him. Perhaps Strindberg had just as bad an effect on the man - and others - as the man had on him. It is often said that like attracts like and a man is known by the company he keeps.

It could just be that both men were in a psychotic state at the time so were strongly drawn to each other.

There is no free will at the lowest levels, just strong currents that can overwhelm people. Maybe both men were trapped in a bad psychological neighbourhood, a place where no normal healthy person could or would venture.   

Maybe his use of black magic against his daughter put Strindberg into the power of something that only lets its hostages and puppets associate with others in the same position.

Perhaps some scripted scenarios were at work.


A big anomaly
Some people who feel that they are superior to the majority of mankind often end up associating mainly with people who are inferior. To hear them talk you would think that only people on the far right of the standard distribution curve for whatever attributes they value are good enough for them, yet many if not all of the people in their lives come from the far left!

I can see this anomaly operating in Strindberg’s life. He said:

Whenever I withdraw from society which I consider injurious, the demons of solitude attack me, and when I look for better friends, I come on the track of the worst.” 

Iis to Strindberg’s credit that, unlike many people who feel that they deserve the best, he was aware that he was getting the exact opposite of what he wanted.

Pointing out the discrepancy between their ideas and the reality of their lives to some people tends to trigger the Attack-Dog Syndrome!

Strindberg’s view of mankind
Strindberg’s opinion of the human race as a whole was not high. He had this to say:

I try to love mankind in the mass; I shut my eyes to their faults, and with inexhaustible patience endure their meanesses and slanders...“

What about the people who had to endure him!

Behind the image
This is not the place to go into it in detail, but many prominent people who are obsessed with the inferiority of the majority of mankind - or of certain demographics - do not bear close inspection.

They lack awareness and integrity; they do not practice what they preach; their values and priorities are all wrong and they and their lives are often in a mess. They often prefer to ‘borrow’ money from others rather than earn it. Their lives may be full of big anomalies; they may keep company with people they despise or people they do not realise or will not admit are no good to anyone. They may mistake image for reality. They may sooner or later fall out with everyone they are involved with.

It is uncanny how the often impassioned rants of such people all sound much the same, as if they all have the same mental condition, as if they are all tuning into and broadcasting from the same source - or are possessed by the same evil entity.

Although there are no such rants in Inferno, Strindberg expressed racist and anti-Semitic views in his letters. It is no surprise to learn that he corresponded with Nietzsche. If they had lived at the same time, he would probably have exchanged letters with H. P. Lovecraft too!

Nietzsche: another brief relationship
The short-lived correspondence took place a few years before the episode with the mystery man. There are some familiar elements here:

It was Nietzsche who first approached Strindberg. The exchange of letters lasted for only a few weeks. There was a cooling off on both sides. Nietzsche suddenly decided to break off the literary relationship. There was no further contact between the two men.

On the surface, it was a matter of sending each other books, praising, recommending and publicising each other’s works and discussing ideas and the possibility of Strindberg’s translating some of Nietzsche’s work into various languages.

There may have been some unseen influences at work here.

Nietzsche was in a bad way psychologically at the time and it soon got much worse. Perhaps his first letter was a cry for help. Strindberg was also in dire straits at the time: he warned Nietzsche that his translation services would be expensive because he had debts and a family to support. Perhaps each eventually felt disappointed in the other.

Perhaps they were a mirror and a messenger for each other.

So Strindberg’s relationship with the mystery man appears to be in some ways a repetition of his relationship with Nietzsche.

Together again: